![]() If you are looking for an alternative to Amazon S3, then this post can help you in finding out one. ![]() If you purchase something using those links, we may receive a commission, but it will not cost you anything extra. Customers may use either set of API they wish.Disclosure: This page may contain affiliate links. The newly released “S3 compatible” APIs are available alongside the existing ones. At this time, the company has said nothing about retiring or end-of-lifing their API. ![]() So, it is doubly surprising that, starting today, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage not only provides an S3 application compatible API, but is not changing their fee structure at all.īackblaze will continue to support their existing APIs. Amazon S3’s standard tiers cost more than four times as much per stored GB. Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage charges just $0.005 per GB per month and $0.01 per downloaded GB. In this goal, they were enormously successful. What Backblazes argument boils down to, is that their initial API design was intended to cut every expense possible. As recently as two years ago, Backblaze posted an articlejustifying their unique cloud storage API. For years Backblaze has been refusing to do so, citing performance and reliability concerns. Backblaze was founded in 2007 and offers both a cloud object storage system and an online tool to backup to B2 Cloud Storage.Ĭustomers have been asking Backblaze for years to provide an S3-like interface. The company describes the APIs as “S3 Compatible,” meaning applications written for S3 should now work on Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage without any new code development. Today, Backblaze added new APIS to their B2 Cloud Storage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |